Originally posted 20th Jan 2016 via LinkedIn:
A few conversations I’ve had with people about blockchain recently have gone like this…
“So, what’s Blockhain?”
Me: “It’s the technology that underpins Bitcoin”
“So, it’s all about money transfers, cryptocurrency and dark web then?”
Me: “No, no, it’s about the transfer of value, a way of tracking & transferring ownership of assets, enabling management of identity, providing KYC, AML and lots of other stuff”
“But didn’t I just see that the technology behind Bitcoin doesn’t actually work?”
Me:”Errrrr…..”
The death of Bitcoin & Blockchain ?
The week started with news that Bitcoin was being pronounced as dying (hence the comments above) by Mike Hearn, one of the originators of Bitcoin. He wrote a blog post titled The resolution of the bitcoin experiment. In a nutshell, he said that Bitcoin was an experiment and, like many other experiments, it had now failed.
The New York Times produced on 14 Jan 2016 quite a nice analysis, A Bitcoin Believer’s Crisis of Faith, which is worth reading to better understanding the issues from a slightly less (and unbiased) perspective.
So, whilst Bitcoin may die, does this infer the end for Blockchain? I’d suggest not for four reasons:
1 - World Economic Forum
Has produced several insightful article into bitcoin and blockchain, such as on 3rd Nov, How will blockchain technology transform financial services? And on 19 Jan 2016, The 7 technologies changing your world. Further evidence of mainstream thinking came when on 17th Jan 2016, Lloyd’s of London CEO Inga Beale namechecked blockchain as part of her presentation on How to survive and thrive in the fintech revolution.
The coverage that the influential WEF is providing on the technology means that it will continue to gain visibility and traction.
2 - Government perspectives
On 19 Jan 2016, UK Government published the Blackett review on Distributed ledger technology and an associated video to explain blockchain and its possible use.
When the UK Government has grasped that something is of such importance that they commission reports to see how they can align with it in order to make “UK Plc” more attractive globally then it’s no bad thing and will help ensure the continued adoption of new technologies.
3 - Investments in Blockchain
There is a lot of investment being ploughed into R&D and startups currently and its increasingly challenging to keep pace with just how much money the technology is consuming. Such is the pace of development that I found it quite amusing the Computer Weekly announced on 4th November that Finance Industry will invest more than $1 Billion in blockchain in the next two years. This is amusing because just four days later, on 8th Nov, Coindesk reported that $1 Billion had in fact been invested in Bitcoin & Blockchain infrastructure
Angelist is now tracking 188 Blockchain Startups (with an average valuation of $4.5 Million) and VC’s are clearly putting a lot of cash in top support the sector – as an example, Boost announced in 2015 that its total investment in Blockchain startups has exceeded $50 Million.
ChainHQ produced a block infographic highlighting the most funded companies in their analysis of investments totaling almost $1 Biliion. This was pretty impressive until Cognizant’s Ian West published an infographic on the 2016 Blockchain Ecosystem that highlighted investments to date of $921 Million.
With this much money directed at a technology space, something must come out of it!
4 - From Use Case to Case Study?
There’s increasing evidence that 2016 will be the year in which projects will move from concept/discovery/Proof of Concept and Forbes had a great headline on 12 Jan 2016 that Blockchains poised to be the Hot Tech for moving money in 2016.
Perhaps Mike Hearn will be proved right and the particular protocol upon which Bitcoin’s Blockchain is based could fail. However there are so many other versions – public, private, permissioned, permissionless, etc. that it’s important to remember that Distributed Ledgers use Blockchains and not just “the” Blockchain.